Hugo Awards 2025: Two Finalists for Best Novel

The Hugo Awards for 2025 will be announced on August 16, 2025 at Seattle WorldCon.

The finalists for best novel:

  • A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher (Tor)
  • Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky (Tordotcom)
  • Alien Clay by Adrian Tchaikovsky (Orbit US, Tor UK)
  • Someone You Can Build a Nest In by John Wiswell (DAW)

Disclaimer: I only review the novels. Go to the Hugo Awards web site to find all the other finalists in many categories. Great reading experiences await!

The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennett (Del Rey, Hodderscape UK)

Find it HERE.

If you love fantasy AND mystery novels, this is the book for you. The cover tells you so, with its intricate design reminiscent of some embossed volume of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The cover does not lie. In the tradition of the best mystery novels, The Tainted Cup introduces the eager reader to a duo of detectives working a seemingly unsolvable mystery: the murder of a nobleman by vicious tree. So–a touch of horror as well.

The detectives are one of the genre’s truly delicious odd couples. Ana Dolabra, a mysterious older eccentric detective-genius, never leaves her house but sits blindfolded in her room filled with books and puts the clues together. Her wet-behind-the-ears assistant, Din, has to fight skepticism by other officials and his own insecurities, meanwhile navigating the eccentric Ana’s crazy requests and encounters. This is a novel that could have been set on Baker Street but instead inhabits an alien landscape with death by the murderous afore-mentioned tree, horrifying gigantic sea-beasts, and officials magically altered so they can do things like remember every single detail of a scene or even page that their eyes fall upon. This novel is also one of a crop of many recent books with protagonists who deal with disabilities, and Bennett handles the topic very well.

The point-of-view character, Din, is an engaging person with many fears and worries. “Of all the Sublimes who could have been my assistant, why did it have to be the one with a forty-span stick up his ass?” grumbles Din’s perhaps stark raving mad but undeniably brilliant master, Ana. As we settle into Din’s head, though, we realize how much the world misjudges him, and why. There’s a hint of romance, too. The characters are fascinating. The world-building and magic systems are very well-done. And this novel sports my favorite feature, a novel with a sequel but no cliff-hanger ending. The Tainted Cup is a satisfying read all by itself. I feel enticed to read on to the sequel, A Drop of Corruption, Book Two in Bennett’s Shadow of the Leviathan series, but not bludgeoned or tricked into doing so.

Bennett’s novel was also short-listed in the fantasy novels category of the 2025 Locus Awards, although it didn’t win, and it is short-listed in the best novel category for this year’s World Fantasy Awards, to be announced on Nov. 2, 2025. More about both the Locus and World Fantasy Awards in later posts.

The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley (Avid Reader Press, Sceptre)

Find it HERE.

The Ministry of Time was short-listed for both the 2025 Arthur C. Clarke Awards in the novels category, and in the best first novel category for the 2025 Locus Awards.

I reviewed this novel in my posts about this year’s Arthur C. Clarke Awards. Find my review HERE. I should also note that in that review, I entered a wrong link to the novel. I’ve since corrected the error in the earlier post. This post gives you the correct link, too. Apologies!

To summarize very briefly: Bradley’s novel is wonderful, ingenious, and thrilling. I loved it.

GREAT NEWS for lovers of this book! I’m so pleased to see that the BBC has recently created a dramatic series based on The Ministry of Time. Find out more HERE. Also HERE. When can we watchers in the U.S. hope to see it? When? When?? Note: There’s a Spanish HBO series of the same name and roughly the same premise from 2015. Don’t confuse that one with this.

The Hugo Awards–and the Usual Controversies

The Hugo Awards for 2025 are soon to be announced. Here is the list of finalists for best novel:

  • The Tainted Cup by Robert Jackson Bennett (Del Rey, Hodderscape UK)
  • The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley (Avid Reader Press, Sceptre)
  • A Sorceress Comes to Call by T. Kingfisher (Tor)
  • Service Model by Adrian Tchaikovsky (Tordotcom)
  • Alien Clay by Adrian Tchaikovsky (Orbit US, Tor UK)
  • Someone You Can Build a Nest In by John Wiswell (DAW)

The winner will be announced on August 16, 2025 at Seattle WorldCon. That means you, Reader, have time for some catch-up reading if you haven’t gotten around to all these wonderful novels. I had a fairly easy job of it, since several of the novels on the Hugo list were also short-listed for the Nebula and Arthur C. Clarke awards, and I had already read them before the Hugo finalists were announced.

Disclaimer: I only review the novels. Yet so many wonderful reading experiences await in the other categories! Go to the Hugo Awards web site to find them all.

In the next several posts, I’ll review the short-listed Hugo Awards nominees for best novel.

As always, I need to mention the latest controversy roiling the Hugos. It seems one of these rears its ugly head every year or so. Last year’s controversy was about alleged censorship related to the WorldCon host for the 2024 awards, China. This year’s is about AI. How trendy. Several officials of WorldCon have resigned over the brouhaha. Briefly: In order to cut down on workload BUT ALSO to deal with possible sensitivity issues in the U.S., the WorldCon officials vetted their panel of judges using ChatGPG. Unfortunately, these AI tools are notoriously unreliable, and often seem to reflect possible prejudices. The use of the tool may have helped out with the workload, but how trustworthy was the resulting panel? The decision to use AI for this purpose was also hugely tone deaf, considering the widespread distrust and animus that the SF community feels toward such tools. Find an account of the controversy HERE.

AI in general, and especially for writers, is a magnet for controversy. The Hugos controversy, thankfully, didn’t involve any use of AI by writers, but it does (or did, until WorldCon took corrective action) impugn the integrity of the award, one of the longest-standing, most respected awards for speculative fiction. As a writer myself, I found this blog post–on the Hugo controversy specifically and the use of AI by writers generally–to be especially interesting. How far should the literary world and individual writers go in embracing these tools flooding into the creative process?

For myself, I don’t use it–I say. Then I think again. But I never use grammar checkers, because in my experience they are dead wrong too much of the time and give bad advice even when they are (sort of) right. Good grammar–good. Good grammar used slavishly–wooden writing. (You see those two sentence fragments I just used?) I do use spell checkers, although not all the time. When I do, I use them very judiciously. They too can provide misleading or just wrong advice. I’d rather risk the occasional typo, which comes to us all. And those are very, very basic uses of Al. Generative AI to write a novel? Horrible, horrible idea. Generative AI to plot a novel, organize time, create marketing copy, and so on? Iffy at best.

AND THEN I climb down off my high horse to realize I have sometimes used AI-generated illustrations for this very blog. I am resolving right now not to resort to that in the future. More problematic for me: As a starving artist, I can’t afford to hire a voice actor to narrate my novels. Do I use AI-generated voices, especially considering how many consumers of fiction get their jollies from audiobooks and not the kind you process with your eyeballs? I’m thinking about it. Am I wrong? Am I a hypocrite? The horror! The horror!

NEXT UP: Reviews of short-listed novels by Robert Jackson Bennet and Kalianne Bradley.

The Arthur C. Clarke Awards short list: Final words

The novels short-listed for this major speculative fiction award include:

  • Annie Bot, Sierra Greer WINNER, reviewed in this post
  • Private Rites, Julia Armfield
  • The Ministry of Time, Kaliane Bradley
  • Extremophile, Ian Green
  • Service Model, Adrian Tchaikovsky–reviewed in this post
  • Thirteen Ways to Kill Lulabelle Rock, Maud Woolf

In my last post, I reviewed the novels by by Green and Woolf. The first post in this series reviewed the novels by Armfield and Bradley.

Service Model, Adrian Tchaikovsky(2024, Tor)

Find out more HERE.

Pay no attention to the masterful, wizardly author behind the curtain. Charles the robot, aka Uncharles, is the star of this show. Here’s the story of total societal collapse told through the point of view of a robot completely hung up on procedure. Technically, you might call the point of view “close-in third person.” We don’t see straight through Charles’s eyes, but we do see all the novel’s events through his robot take on the world. It’s a tour-de-force.

In the opening scene, Charles, a valet robot, has just murdered his master. He has no idea that’s what he has done, just that after he has shaved his master with the usual straight razor, a mysterious red stain on his master’s clothing must be dealt with. You can think here of C-3PO or Murderbot, but really, Tchaikovsky’s portrayal–while every bit as sly and satirical–goes much deeper, into the ways robots operate and how they really might approach the end of humanity and the human-built world.

In his attempt to get his obvious if puzzling robot dysfunction addressed, Charles goes on a lengthy odyssey that takes him to all the important sites of human societal dysfunction: the clogged-up bureaucratic systems, the lust for power run amuck, the misappropriation of information technology, the misunderstanding of what robots are and what they are capable of accomplishing. It’s a kind of reverse Wizard of Oz. In this world of encroaching uncontrolled AI, the problems Charles encounters are also important issues for Tchaikovsky’s human readers.

Charles’s perspective and his trajectory change when he happens upon another seeming dysfunctional robot calling herself The Wonk. Together, the two first work together simply to survive, but then they begin working on the main problem, how to salvage society. They make the perfect team: Charles’s dogged procedural robot nature and The Wonk’s creative unpredictability. She must be a very dysfunctional robot, then, mustn’t she?

This book is incredibly fun to read, and underneath the fun lurks a sly message. It was short-listed not only for this year’s Arthur C. Clarke award, which it didn’t win, but also for the upcoming Hugos.

Annie Bot, Sierra Greer (2024, HarperCollins)

This year’s Arthur C. Clarke Award WINNER for best novel

Find out more HERE.

It’s easy to see why this novel won this year’s Arthur C. Clarke Award. It’s the very engaging first-person account of an AI girlfriend and her struggles with her controlling boyfriend/owner, so it checks a lot of SF boxes as well as a lot of relationship boxes. I don’t pretend to know how awards committees come up with their decisions. All I know about it I learned from Percival Everett’s Erasure. But I can see why this novel would be a popular choice.

I paired my review of this book with Tchaikovsky’s because, well, robots, right? There the comparison ends. Although. . . they are both books from the robot perspective. Greer’s novel goes whole hog; it is written in first person, so everything we see, we see through Annie Bot’s eyes. This also, I imagine, makes the book fun and accessible for readers who come to their task of fictional empathizing through this increasingly common technical writing device.

In a near future, this novel postulates that lonely men can buy themselves a robot companion for sex. That is not SF. It is absolutely believable, since personal robots are already on the market and sex robots are definitely a thing (Be warned before you click on that link to a site called The Guy Shack, if you don’t want your eyeballs or your internet history to reflect such a topic, and I hope my kids understand after I’m gone that I’m just a writer doing her research!). The science fiction part comes in when the main character of this novel, Annie Bot, a robot, begins to explore her own agency. Or is that SF? Here’s the intriguing premise behind the novel. Which of your friends’ girlfriends is actually human, and which might just be pretending? The Turing Test comes to mind. But Annie’s struggle also reflects real issues of abuse and control in intimate relationships. The writing sounds sort of robotic, but I guess that fits the character. It’s an engaging novel and a fast read.

AT THIS POINT in my series of reviews for short-listed novels, I usually pick my favorite. And I never try to second-guess the judges, because as I mentioned above in this post, I have no idea what drives them. It feels funny to do that now that a decision has been made, but I can tell you that FOR ME and me alone, there was no contest. My favorite of the novels in this list was Ian Green’s Extremophile. I found almost all the others to be interesting, worthwhile, and often entertaining novels, and I’m glad I read all of them.

NEXT: on to the short-listed novels for the 2025 Hugo Awards.