And the winners of the 2024 Locus Awards are. . .

. . .too many to discuss thoroughly in this space. Here are a few of the winners in categories I follow, and no knock to shorter forms, which I don’t read enough:

Best SF novel: Martha Wells, System Collapse

Best fantasy novel: Martha Wells, Witch King

Best first novel: Vajra Chandrasekera, The Saint of Bright Doors

I don’t have much standing to comment on these. My project for reading all of the finalists for best novel posted by all the major speculative fiction awards was a bit too ambitious for me this year–I only decided to read this huge list of novels at the beginning of May–and that is especially true of the Locus Awards, coming so fast after the Nebula Awards. Next year I’ll do better! My take on the Locus Awards is that the vote is for fan-favorites, which is fine. However, Martha Wells is such a brand name that I feel slightly skeptical of the results. I should read more of her books to decide on that.

In the SF category: I need to read Wells’s System Collapse and see what I think. Among the runners-up, Ann Leckie’s Translation State (see my review HERE) is a really good book, and Annalee Newitz’s The Terraformers is simply superb. See my review HERE. To vote against either of those two must have taken a lot, and I can only hope all voters made a good-faith effort to read the entire list. As I say, I have little standing to comment or complain–there are seven other novels on that short-list that I haven’t read yet! One of the runners-up, Starter Villain, by John Scalzi, is nominated for the Hugo Award this year, so I plan to read that one soon in my quest to read every novel short-listed for the Hugo.

In the fantasy category: Witch King, the novel by Wells that I did read, was good but not overpoweringly good (only my opinion). Of the runners-up, I’ve only read S. L. Huang’s The Water Outlaws, which I liked more. See my reviews HERE and HERE.

In the first novel category: Here’s a winner I can enthusiastically endorse. Chandrasekera’s The Saint of Bright Doors just won the Nebula Award for best novel, and it richly deserves the Locus win as well. See my review HERE. I did love one of the runners-up, Wole Talabi’s Shigidi and the Brass Head of Obalufon. If that book had won either of these two awards, the Nebula or the Locus, I would have called it a great decision. See my review HERE. My gut feel is that Chandrasekera’s novel has more gravitas, and Talabi’s novel is more fun. I haven’t read any of the other short-listed books on the first-novels list for the Locus, but I am just about to finish one of them, Some Desperate Glory, by Emily Tesh. That novel has been short-listed for both the Arthur C. Clarke Award and the Hugo Award, too. I’ll be reviewing it soon. I’m on the last few chapters, and I had to put the book down to write this post! (Just put. the. book. down, Jane.) Another novel short-listed for Locus best first novel is Nana Kwame Adjei-Brenyah’s Chain-Gang All-Stars. I’ll read this one next and review it soon, because it is also short-listed for the Arthur C. Clarke Award, coming up fast on July 24..

As I’ve mentioned in preceding posts: I don’t read horror. I have nothing against horror. Some of my most admired writer-friends and mentors are writers of horror (John Skipp!) and some of my favorite novels in other categories of speculative fiction (China Miéville!) have more than a touch of horror in them. My own writing has been known to have a touch of horror in it. But I don’t really know horror and don’t feel I have enough insight into the genre to blog about it. I imagine anyone really interested in reading horror will find some good choices in the Locus Awards horror category.

And I feel bad that I don’t pay enough attention to shorter forms, especially the short story. That’s something I as a reader should remedy. I’ve been participating in the great George Saunders Story Club substack, where I’ve started re-acquainting myself with some of the masters of (literary) short fiction, so I’m making an honest start on that project. The categories for shorter forms short-listed for the Locus Award will give any reader of speculative fiction plenty of chances to discover something great.

Not to mention other media. . .The Hugo Awards are awarded in categories other than fiction in print form, and I may have to take a look at some of their nominees in film, gaming, long-form video/television, and all the rest. Essentially, though, I am a reader first, mostly a reader of novels, and that’s what this blog is (mostly) about.

And now, on to some heavy-duty reading, all of the nominees, all SF, for the 2024 Arthur C. Clarke Award, to be announced on July 24th.

Which Nebula finalist do you pick?

What a hard choice! Now that I’ve read all six Nebula Awards 2024 finalists for best novel, I’ve thought about which one I’d vote for. If I had a vote, that is. I don’t.

BUT IF I DID–oh, man. Hard, hard choice. These six novels are all so great. Here are the six, again–and see my preceding three posts for reviews of each:

Nebula Award for Novel (from https://nebulas.sfwa.org/sfwa-announces-the-59th-nebula-awards-finalists/)

I really think I’d vote for Annalee Newitz’s The Terraformers. It’s unique, it’s compelling, it’s beautifully written. What it has to say is incredibly important. It checks all my boxes. However–BIG however–I’d have to think hard before voting for it instead of The Saint of Bright Doors, by Vajira Chandrasekera. That novel is just as excellent, and in the same ways. What a hard choice! Making it even harder, Shigidi and the Brass Head of Obalufon, by Wole Talabi, is right up there with those two. And I loved the other three. Don’t make me choose! I guess I’m just as glad I’m not a member of the SWFA and have to cast a ballot for only one, although I’m actually thinking of applying to join.

Information about the SWFA

The Nebula Awards are sponsored by the SFWA–The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association. Only members of the SFWA vote. The SFWA web site explains: “full, senior, and associate members” of the SFWA are eligible to vote. What is the SFWA, exactly, and who are its members? Here’s the information from the SFWA web site about eligibility for membership. I’m not a member now, but I am considering joining–only as an associate, though. I’m not that successful! You can join if you are an indie-published, traditionally-published, or hybrid-published author of SF or fantasy, as long as you meet certain requirements for income generated from your books.

What I take away from this information: there are other categories for membership, but for the most part, the Nebula Award is decided by OTHER WRITERS of the same types of books–not by some academic panel or celebrity judges. I think that’s important. If you’ve ever tried to write a book like one of these, it’s hard. To do it well–harder. To do it at the level of these six amazing writers–WOW. Just wow. (Excuse me while I fangirl out a little, here. Just a bit!)

COMING UP NEXT: More SF and Fantasy awards.

Watch this spot. The Locus Awards are coming right up, and after that, the Hugo. Happy reading!

Two More Nebula Finalists

Continuing my previous post on the short-listed novels for the 2024 Nebula award, here are two more reviews of the finalists, Ann Leckie’s Translation State and Vajra Chandrasekera’s The Saint of Bright Doors:

Find out more HERE.

Ann Leckie, Translation State (Orbit, 2023)

A compelling read from Leckie, who returns to a familiar setting, the interstellar empire of the Radch. Some time ago, I read the first of her Imperial Radch trilogy, Ancillary Justice, and reviewed it for this blog. At the time, I found the book hard to penetrate, but by the end of the novel, pretty fascinating. I was unsure whether I’d continue the series, and in fact didn’t. Now, with Translation State, I’ve returned to Leckie’s complex world of intrigue and danger and exotic species. The characters, the plot, the ingenious, very organic and natural-seeming use of pronouns to delineate a gender-fluid universe of peoples and cultures, are all outstanding. This novel is billed as a stand-alone novel in the Radch universe, but I agree with many reviewers who point out that the more a reader knows about that universe, the better the reading experience with this most recent novel.

Throughout Translation State, I was in awe of Leckie’s world-building. The Radch are not the main focus of this book, although their influence pervades the complicated politics that drive the plot. This novel focuses on the mysterious Presger and the intermediate forms some of them take to bridge from their alien consciousness to the humans with whom they exist in an uneasy alliance. A too-fragile treaty may be the only barrier standing between humanity and annihilation, so the stakes are high. I was reminded of Iain Banks’s great Culture novels.

To inhabit the mind of a species this removed from the human is quite a feat, and Leckie pulls it off. I’m thinking of other novels that accomplish something similar, such as William Golding’s The Inheritors, or Isaac Asimov’s The Gods Themselves (which itself won the Nebula in 1972). I guess I could mention China Miéville’s great Embassytown, too, but that novel is in a class by itself.

Is it mean-spirited of me to say that in the end, I was a bit let down by Leckie’s tale of found family? On the other hand, while it may be fascinating to imagine the politics and treaties that stitch the universe together, in the end, at least for the novel (for readers? for human beings?), it all comes down to the personal. Only connect. Translation State is actually a very sweet-natured novel, and I enjoyed it immensely. And I think now I’ll return to the Ancillary books and start reading them in order.

Find out more HERE.

Vajra Chandrasekera, The Saint of Bright Doors (Tordotcom, 2023)

This novel, by Sri Lankan writer Chandrasekera, is simply astounding, a sweeping tale of power and the structures that drive power, loosely based on a legend about Siddhartha. The novel has received wide acclaim, nominated for the Locus award and short-listed for the Lambda award, among other accolades. Chandrasekera imagines a hybrid world of the fantastic (gods and anti-gods and spirits and demons and messiahs abound, as well as the mysterious “bright doors” of the title) and the realistic–shoddy apartment blocks in a steamy South Asian city, civil unrest, unfathomable and obscure caste distinctions, corrupt politics, and more–a heady mix. This is a characteristic Chandrasekera’s novel shares, at least a bit, with his fellow nominee Talabi’s Shigidi and the Brass Head of Obalufon (reviewed in my preceding post), except that in Talabi’s novel, the spirit world and the regular world, while they may intersect, are clearly separate–that’s even a huge plot point in Talabi’s novel. In Chandrasekera’s novel, the spirit world’s and the ordinary world’s objects and personae and passions and concerns are all jammed and mashed together in a dizzying stew that defies any attempt (reader’s, chararacters’) to pry them apart.

This novel is infused with the historical and political concerns of Sri Lanka, matters pretty completely opaque to me. I refer readers of this blog to this great review and analysis published recently on the Strange Horizons magazine site. The reviewer, New Zealand writer Tehnuka, has a far greater understanding of these issues than I ever will. That said, even without the deep background of readers like her, I can tell you I found Chandrasekera’s novel as compelling a read as anything I’ve come across lately.

Its political concerns are not just local and regional, either. Many readers, from many parts of the world, will resonate with this aspect of the novel. Great quotation, too frighteningly true in too many parts of the world, not excepting my own:

the law might do anything, at any time, to anyone, and justify itself any way it likes–it is feral, like the invisible laws and powers of the world of which it is a pale imitation.