The Thrill of the Series

TODAY: Classic Speculative Fiction Series

The first of three posts: Classic series (today), Some of my Favorites, Problem series

ONE THING: A series of stories set in that world, so I have the illusion, at least, that I’ll never have to leave it.

For me the reader, this accounts for the appeal of a book series. For me the writer, it also accounts for that appeal. For me the writer, I’ll live in my book world a lot longer than any reader, because it will keep populating in my imagination, and I’ll have time to write only some of that down. But I’ll have all of it in my head.

Speculative fiction especially grabs its readers through series. I feel like I should do a lot more reading before I write this post and two more related posts about speculative fiction series. So many books. . .so little time!

SOME OF THE CLASSICS

The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien

Source: the Tolkien Society web site, photographer Pamela Chandler

Tolkien (1892-1973) is the man who wrote the epic fantasy series that started modern-day fantasy. The Lord of the Rings trilogy is totally immersive and hugely influential. The writing is not my favorite, but that hardly matters. Peter Jackson made wonderful movies of the three main volumes (psst, originally written as one mammoth volume, in case you’re wondering why the first and second just stop cold), and Tolkien produced tons of other material that you could think of as series-adjacent. The Tolkien universe is so huge and complex that only its most avid fans know how to thread through it all, from The Hobbit, a beloved children’s book, all the way to a multitude of related books and stories that only the initiate know about. Here’s a helpful web site if you need a guide. Tolkien himself was a fascinating man. He was a celebrated scholar of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford University, the man who brought Beowulf to the attention of the world. He populated his worlds of imagination from his scholarly knowledge and his lifelong fascination with languages, building his fantasy world from the inside out. “Here’s an interesting way language could work, and here’s an interesting potential language that could come out of that. Now, what kind of people would speak such a language, and what kind of world would they live in?” That seemed to have been his thinking. His military service in World War I and his ardent Roman Catholicism also shaped his writing. For a quick read, learn more through the Tolkien Society, and for a deep dive, get Humphrey Carpenter’s 1977 biography. Carpenter also wrote an interesting book about Tolkien and the Inklings, his literary circle: The Inklings: C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Charles Williams and Their Friends (1979).

The Chronicles of Narnia, C. S. Lewis

The most famous of the Narnia books. Find them all here.

Lewis (1898-1963) was Tolkien’s friend, academic colleague, and fellow Inkling. The Narnia books, like Tolkien’s The Hobbit, are notable classics of children’s literature. The first, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, has been a must-read for generations of children, their gateway (wardrobe portal?) into fantasy. With a few exceptions, the other six novels are rather preachy and Christian-apologetic. Lewis was a great scholar of Renaissance English literature, the man who almost single-handedly resurrected literary interest in Edmund Spenser and John Milton (very important to me personally, since that’s my academic field). He also wrote a lot of religious tract-like material beloved of the Religious Right, although he was a faithful Anglican his whole life. Some Religious Right outfit made pretty bad movies from several of the books in the series, but fans can hope Greta Gerwig’s Narnia streaming series gets off the ground. The reading order of the Narnia books isn’t quite as complicated as for Tolkien’s entire body of fantasy work, but it does have its complications. There are two ways to do it: chronologically according to story line, or by publication date. Here is a helpful guide. Unlike Tolkien, and more like most fantasy writers, Lewis wrote from the outside in. He imagined his fantasy world, and then he fleshed it out. The way he was led to do that has roots in his childhood and relationship with his much-loved older brother. Humphrey Carpenter’s book about the Inklings (see above) is a good place to start if you want to do a deep dive, and so is Jack: A Life of C. S. Lewis, by George Sayer. For a quick unbiased overview, see the official C. S. Lewis web site. An evangelical Christian take on Lewis can be found here or here or here. His own book, Surprised by Joy, is a good introduction to both his life and his religious beliefs. The film Shadowlands (1993) explores many of these issues and is really well-done. It was based on a stage play and an earlier BBC televised production which might be even better than the more well-known Anthony Hopkins-Debra Winger film. Mark Saint-Germaine’s 2009 play Freud’s Last Session, imagining a meeting and debate between Sigmund Freud and Lewis, is really great, too, if you ever have a chance to see it. I was lucky enough to attend an off-Broadway production. Lewis wrote prolifically about religious subjects, but he did write other fiction, including an SF series for adults, the Space Trilogy, which is even more indebted to ideas from Spenser and Milton than the Narnia books–not to mention a big academic controversy of the day.

The Time Quintet, Madeleine L’Engle

Image in the public domain, accessed through Wikimedia Commons

A Wrinkle in Time, an SF book for young adults, had a hard road to publication, especially since most SF books of the time did not have female main characters. It went on to win the Newbery Medal among many other awards, and its author, Madeleine L’Engle (1918-2007), wrote four sequels: A Wind in the Door, A Swiftly Tilting Planet, Many Waters, and An Acceptable Time. L’Engle wrote a second, related series and other novels exploring similar ground. Like Lewis, L’Engle was a committed Christian and attended mostly Episcopal churches (The Episcopal Church being the U.S. branch of Anglicanism). She was especially associated with the Episcopal Cathedral of St. John the Divine in Manhattan. Her books explore religious themes congruent with her belief in Christian universalism. I don’t find them as preachy and doctrinaire as the Narnia books, but then my own ideas about religion tilt more in her direction than in his. Some evangelical readers find L’Engle’s books offensive because of her universalism. I think they are great books for young girls to read–an intelligent and spunky young girl is the main character, and L’Engle’s religious ideas are expansive and generous. That’s just me. You, Reader, can make up your own mind. The first of these novels was made into a sadly unsuccessful movie. Learn more about L’Engle by visiting her official web site. Her obituary in the Times of London, accessed through the Wayback machine, is a good way to find out more as well.

The Hainish Cycle, Ursula LeGuin

LeGuin (1929-2018) wrote deeply-involving novels with convincing and fascinating anthropological underpinnings. The daughter of an anthropologist and a writer, she pioneered soft SF, less concerned with hardware and technology, more concerned with imagining different cultures. Her writing is brilliant, lauded by the literary world in general as well as within speculative fiction. The Left Hand of Darkness (1969), one of the Hainish SF novels, won both the Hugo and Nebula Awards in 1970 and is one of the best, most affecting books I have ever read. She wrote many other kinds of books, including the beloved coming-of-age fantasy novel A Wizard of Earthsea (1968), the children’s series Catwings, the brilliant short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelos,” and more. She must hold some kind of record for the number of her major speculative fiction awards–Hugo, Locus, Nebula, others–during a lifetime of influential and highly acclaimed writing. She was heavily influenced by ideas from anthropology and sociology and by Jungian and Taoist thought. She incorporated feminist ideas about gender and sexuality into her writing well before most were very well-informed about such matters, and crusaded for political tolerance and the rights of authors steamrolled by big publishing companies and platforms (See this and this). Learn more through her official web site. The influential literary critic Harold Bloom wrote a detailed critique of her work, which he hugely admired.

Foundation, Isaac Asimov

Original cover of the first book, 1951

Asimov (1920-1992) was a scientist educated at Columbia University, with a professorship at Boston University, and he poured his knowledge and varied interests into his SF books, some of the best from the Golden Age of SF. The Foundation trilogy won a 1966 Hugo award as best all-time series. Asimov followed the trilogy up with further Foundation novels organized in a number of related series. A streaming series was based on his Foundation world-building. Here’s a terrible confession: I have never been able to get through the Foundation novels. I will say there are standalone Asimov books I’ve loved, especially a deep fondness for Pebble in the Sky (1950) and The Stars, Like Dust (1951)–and I admired but found flawed The Gods Themselves, which won the 1972 Hugo, Nebula, and Locus Awards in a boffo trifecta. Whatever I may think, Asimov’s influence on speculative fiction was and remains immense and his output, prolific. His envisioning of a galaxy-wide empire is the precursor to many another SF book or series of books–and movies and all the rest–world-building that features a galactic empire and its wide-ranging conflicts. Asimov has said he was inspired by Gibbons’s Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire and Thucydides’s history of the Peloponnesian War. Among several other terms he invented, the word “robotics” is probably the most well-known and widely used, and he was a true Renaissance man, writing academic science, popular science, mystery, children’s books, popular history, dirty limericks, and on and on. Hmm, maybe we should conduct a contest to see whether his number of speculative fiction awards beats out Ursula LeGuin’s. He has an impressive list of them. His political views and his behavior frequently roused controversy. To learn more about Asimov, you can’t do better than heading to this web site.

The Dune Saga, Frank Herbert

Find it here.

After a career in journalism, the largely self-taught Herbert (1920-1986) began selling stories to SF magazines. With his ground-breaking novel Dune (1965), he achieved fame as one of the New Wave of SF writers. The structure of Dune is innovative–episodes of adventure involving the novel’s main character are interspersed with purported anthropological, historical, and ecological accounts of the culture of his planet, part of a far-flung galactic empire. I found this first book of the series pretty brilliant, with its invented history/anthropology sandwiched between thrilling action sequences. It won the 1965 Nebula award and shared the Hugo in 1966. I could barely get through the next in the series, Dune Messiah, and I didn’t bother reading the other four sequels, the writing was so bad. But many readers love them. You may be among those fans. He died before he could finish the last in the series. Whatever you think about it, the Dune saga is a hugely influential SF series, with innovative world-building and a forward-thinking emphasis on ecology, one of Herbert’s lifelong passions. The Dune universe has tempted several different movie-makers to have a go at it. The latest films, directed by Denis Villeneuve, divided the first book into two parts and have been extremely successful. The second book of the series, Dune Messiah, is in the early stages of production, although it will be the third in the film trilogy. Villeneuve says he won’t go past that book to any later books in the series, which I think is a wise choice. I enjoyed the first of Villeneuve’s films very much, but the second only so-so. (No, really–were you convinced by Timothée Chalamet and Austin Butler going at it as supposedly the best fighters in the universe? Me neither.) But people keep trying to make movies out of this material. Even the crazy 1984 David Lynch version has its rabid fans. Herbert, a complicated man, opposed the Viet Nam War but was a lifelong Republican. Many would call him libertarian. For more about Herbert and the Dune saga, see this web site maintained by his son Brian Herbert and Kevin Anderson. The two have collaborated on fiction that furthers the Dune universe.

THE END of Valentine Week 2025: Fairytale Fantasy, Day SEVEN

This year’s theme: RED RIDING HOOD

Here we are, at the end of Valentine Week 2025.

The novels I have featured this year:

Red Rider, by Kate Avery Ellison (2019, indie-published)—reviewed HERE

Wolves and Daggers: A Red Riding Hood Retelling, by Melanie Karsak (2018, indie published–Clockpunk Press, which seems to be owned by the author)–reviewed HERE

Beauty and the Werewolf, by Mercedes Lackey (2011, Harlequin Nocturne)–reviewed HERE

Crimson Bound, by Rosamund Hodge (2015, HarperCollins)–reviewed HERE

Scarlet, by Marissa Meyer (2013, Macmillan)reviewed HERE

TODAY:

For the Wolf, by Hannah Whitten (2021, Orbit)–quick capsule review

AND

Other interesting fictions based on Little Red

First, a capsule review:

For the Wolf, by Hannah Whitten (2021, Orbit)

I reviewed this novel for my first series of Valentine Week posts, in 2022. Find my review HERE.

A quick recap and a few thoughts: The really nice cover art screams Little Red, and a few of the superficial details do, too. But for the most part, this novel is Beauty and the Beast all the way. As we’ve seen this week, Beauty and the Beast makes a natural pairing with Red Riding Hood, and elements of both fairy tales are often seen in retellings of Red Riding Hood. I think it’s interesting that in these novels–and especially in Whitten’s–the marketing all points toward Red Riding Hood. Why not Beauty and the Beast? That’s especially true of Whitten’s novel. Would a content analysis of fairytale retellings published in 2020 and 2021 reveal a surplus of Beauty and the Beast? It’s a mystery to me why marketing departments sell readers via Little Red but the story itself goes all Beauty and the Beast on us. Could the popular culture appeal of the Disney Beauty and the Beast (which I actually really like, by the way) be so overwhelming that books and their covers need to veer away?

Whitten’s YA novel, which features many of the usual YA tropes, is about two sisters, one of whom has to be given to the wolf–some mysterious creature in the woods–in a murkily-explained ritual sacrifice. The main character gets shipped off to the wolf’s castle, where she finds a tormented beast laboring under a curse. The most interesting part of this novel, in my opinion, is the sentient forest. But see my post of 2022 for a full review.

OTHER RED RIDING HOOD FICTIONS:

The Path, a single-player indie video game that re-invents Red Riding Hood as a parable of emerging womanhood. It is stunning, an art object all its own and a really creepy horror-themed, Freudian-infused journey. There’s only one rule to the game: “Stay on the path.” BUT in order to win the game you must: (SPOILER ALERT!) go off the path! You can get it on Steam for PC.

Into the Woods. Red Riding Hood is one of the major story lines in the wildly popular Steven Sondheim 1986 musical, and Little Red herself is one of the major characters. In 2014, Disney (did I say I wouldn’t talk about Disney in this series? I lied.) made a movie based on the musical.

Angela Carter’s amazing Red Riding Hood short stories, in her collection titled The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories (Harper & Row, 1979). There are Bluebeard retellings, Beauty and the Beast retellings, and many more, all beautiful, all strange, all completely wonderful. The main Red Riding Hood retelling is “The Company of Wolves.” It was the basis for a film directed by Neil Jordan in 1984. Two other tales in Carter’s collection are based on some version of the Red Riding Hood folktale: “The Werewolf” and “Wolf-Alice.” But “The Company of Wolves is especially superb. “See!” it ends. “sweet and sound she sleeps in granny’s bed, between the paws of the tender wolf.” Wow, what a story.

You can get this collection at Amazon in hard cover, paperback, and audiobook; in paperback at Barnes & Noble; and in ebook and audiobook formats on Apple.

HERE’S WHERE I ANNOUNCE MY FAVORITES

If we are speaking of the novels I’ve reviewed, that’s a hard one. I liked two of them–Meyer’s Scarlet and Lackey’s Beauty and the Werewolf–but I didn’t just adore any of them.

BUT I do adore that Angela Carter short story, “The Company of Wolves.” And I love the indie game The Path. If I were more of a musical comedy fan, I’d probably mention Into the Woods as well.

Valentine Week 2025: Fairytale Fantasy, Day SIX

This year’s theme: RED RIDING HOOD

A reminder–The novels I’ll review during this year’s Fairytale Fantasy series:

Red Rider, by Kate Avery Ellison (2019, indie-published)—reviewed HERE

Wolves and Daggers: A Red Riding Hood Retelling, by Melanie Karsak (2018, indie published–Clockpunk Press, which seems to be owned by the author)–reviewed HERE

Beauty and the Werewolf, by Mercedes Lackey (2011, Harlequin Nocturne)–reviewed HERE

Crimson Bound, by Rosamund Hodge (2015, HarperCollins)–reviewed HERE

Scarlet, by Marissa Meyer (2013, Macmillan)–TODAY’S REVIEWED NOVEL

For the Wolf, by Hannah Whitten (2021, Orbit)

And finally: a medley of interesting outlier pieces, all based on Little Red

TODAY’S REVIEWED NOVEL:

Scarlet, by Marissa Meyer (2013, Macmillan)

Buy this novel–and all the books in its series, The Lunar Chronicles–on Amazon in hard cover, paperback, ebook, and audiobook formats. If you’re a member of Kindle Unlimited, you can read it there free. At Barnes & Noble, Scarlet is available in hard cover, paperback, ebook, and audio formats, and the other books in the Lunar Chronicles as well. In addition, several of the series books (not Scarlet, though) are available in large print editions, and you can listen to the audiobook versions of several of the series books with a Barnes & Noble audiobooks subscription free–again, though, not Scarlet. Apple offers Scarlet and all the other books in the series in ebook and audio formats, and so does Kobo. For more about all these books, visit the author’s web site.

How about that, a sci-fi Red Riding Hood! This novel is set in a dystopian future where humans have settled the moon and then mutated. The moon people, led by their evil queen, want to become humanity’s new overlords. Against this setting, we have a girl with flaming red hair and a temper to match. We have a grandmother. And we have a lot of werewolf-type large buff guys. As with most of the books I’ve reviewed this week, the story may have been inspired by the Red Riding Hood folk tale, but there the resemblance ends. I keep being astonished, though, at how many of these Riding Hood retellings feature werewolves–and astonished, as I’ve said, to learn that werewolves really are part of the deep folkloric background of the tale.

Like Red Rider, the Ellison novel I reviewed on day one of Valentine Week, Meyer’s novel is set in the future, a dystopian future where werewolves play an evil role in turning the earth into a hellhole. Unlike Ellison’s novel, where the vibe is pretty much fantasy, the vibe in Meyer’s book is unmistakably SF, including all manner of SF gadgetry, including futuristic air cars and futuristic maglev trains. Scarlet is a girl who has had to learn to be tough, because she leads a tough life. When she meets a mysterious man (yep, he’s a prizefighter. . .werewolves and prizefighters. . .this must be a thing), she is drawn to him but also repelled by his strangeness. Her grandmother has been kidnapped, though, and the police are no help, so Scarlet takes help where she can find it–the help of the man named Wolf. Violence and peril ensue.

Here’s what happened when I started reading this novel. It is Book 2 of a series, and I had hoped this book, like other mid-series books, would catch me up about the doings of Book 1 in some handy little paragraph early on. Unlike the Lackey novel I reviewed a few days ago, the individual books of The Lunar Chronicles are not stand-alone novels within a larger framework, but true sequels. I soon discovered that without reading Book 1, Cinder (yep, based on Cinderella), I was at sea. Cinder, the title character of Book 1, plays a major role in this second book, too. After a lot of grumbling, I got Cinder and started all over from the beginning, Book 1, chapter 1, page 1.

I’m glad I did. The story arc of the series unfolds as a nice whole, even though Cinder’s and Scarlet’s stories, based on different fairytale tropes, have some differences. And best of all, there’s no hard cliffhanger ending at the end of Cinder. If you’ve followed this blog, you know how much I hate those. As a result, I had two great reading experiences. If I never continue to Book 3, I’ll still feel very fond of the two books I did read. And I really might continue, because the writing is good, the plot zips along, and the characters are fun. I really like Cinder and Scarlet. They are kind of anti-Disney anti-princesses. (That’s a GOOD thing.) Enjoy these books! If you do read Scarlet, though, I recommend you read Cinder first.

NEXT UP: As Valentine Week ends, I’ll do a quick mini-review of For the Wolf, by Hannah Whitten, and give you a link to my full review of a few year’s ago. I’ll also mention a whole treasure-chest of other Red Riding Hood experiences, some in book form, some not.